At some point during my grad school career, I read a fabulous article: "Wendell Berry on Marriage: Marriage in the Membership" from a 2007 edition of Communio. Wendell Berry is not quite Catholic, and yet so many of his ideas and beliefs are absolutely Catholic at their core, particularly where he talks about marriage and community. Marriage, to Wendell Berry - as well as the Catholic Church - is fundamental for the community, and the community is likewise fundamental for marriage. The two need each other absolutely. "Marriage is based on fidelity, and fidelity is the foundation of all relationships, civil and domestic... Fidelity is the word of love without which none of us would find life worth living." (524) The American culture no longer values community like it once did. We're all just a bunch of individuals, willing to move hither, thither, and yon in order to pursue our dream career but at the expense of putting down roots and knowing what it's like to be accountable to others, to be depended on by and dependent on others. We have smart phones, texts, Skype, and think that's good enough to deepen the relationships we build along the way. Sometimes that's the only way, obviously, but it's certainly not the best way. Better than nothing, but a poor substitute for chats in person.
We need a complete reordering of our understanding of what it means to be human - part of a community, not simply a bunch of independent individuals. We need a renewed understanding of what love is, and what marriage is. Hint: it's not just a way to say to the world that these two people love each other and want you to know it. We need a better understanding of what sex is, what it does, why it's important - and why it's not. At Janet Smith's talk I went to early this year, she brought up the example of a couple whose wife had kidney problems that would make pregnancy very dangerous. So she told her husband they'd have to be very careful with NFP until it cleared up. His response? He basically told her she was crazy to suggest he'd put her life in danger even the smallest bit by having sex, and so they abstained. For four years.
That's love. Janet Smith's counterpart at that debate brought up the example of a couple who got permission from a priest to start using contraception when they couldn't enjoy a birthday dinner and evening together because they'd be too tempted, and at that time didn't want (couldn't afford?) another child. One of these examples seems to exude true, deep, selfless love and one...does not.
It's a sad mark of our culture that it's no longer wedding proposals girls dream about and long for, but they settle instead for invitations to move in together. Something that struck me earlier this year when I saw The Vow is that, though the central couple are married, in the flashbacks we don't see a proposal. We see the guy arranging blueberries on a plate to read "Move in?" Cue music. Women should demand more. If a man is willing to ask the woman he loves to move in with him, what's stopping him from making her his wife while he's at it? Moving in isn't a commitment at all, and that's the problem.
I started watching You've Got Mail recently. I've become far too sensitive to this stuff, I think, but I can't stand how devalued marriage is in that movie (and many others). The two central characters are both living with other people while falling in love online with each other. Tom Hanks' character comes from a line of uncommitted men with multiple marriages and long-term live-in relationships. But we're supposed to buy the central relationship, the one we all root for throughout the movie and cheer about at the end, as true and lasting - and hey, it's not like either of those two were married before (or when) they met each other, right? And conveniently enough, both of their non-spouses fell out of love, too, so it's a win for everyone!
Except then what happens after the credits role and these two people are forced to face the reality that maybe someday they'll both grow bored of each other, or one or the other will, and find themselves online again, allowing themselves to connect deeply and emotionally with some new person.
One of the reasons I love the movie Return to Me so much is that it doesn't have any of this. It has a couple who are together for years - until death do they part, and not even totally then. The best friend is in a solid, happy - if not perfect - marriage with lots of happy, loud kids. The main character herself is sweet, innocent, and modest. It's a refreshing movie in a genre filled with sex, shallow understandings of what love really is, and uncommitted relationships that only exist so long as they're convenient and passion/emotion-filled.
I sort of got off the subject of Wendell Berry and his amazingness and instead started talking about movies, but movies are indicative of our culture to a great extent and reflect the "community" that we live in. Unfortunately, the community we seem to live in now is one that highly values individualism, following your heart's desire (regardless of who that might affect or hurt), and, let's face it, sex whenever and wherever and however we want it. Fidelity, so highly valued in Wendell Berry's world, is at best nearly nonexistent, if not outright derided, in our culture. As Berry says, "In an intact community, the marriage vows are given
before the membership. The couple doesn't just exchange them with one another. The vows are given
before witnesses, who are there partly because they are party to the contract. This young couple is pledging from now on to be to a certain extent predictable in their behavior...Something like that
ought to be witnessed by people who will acknowledge that it happened and that these awe-full things were said." (525) This is why community is so important for marriage - community that will remind the couple of those vows they said, and what they mean. I've heard lots of people say that they knew one couple who got divorced, and then it was like divorce became acceptable and swept through their friends' relationships. "The shattering fact of a series of divorces is death to the membership." Marriage is hard, and it's especially so when that marriage is isolated from any kind of real community. At the same time, the community
needs marriages to survive.
Community requires a kind of responsibility on the part of the couple, who are so integral to its health and well-being that they're given a strong reason to keep going even when they want to give up. This is particularly true when children are involved (or, at least, it should be). Marriage doesn't take place in a vacuum. It's not about two singular individuals who join together for some amount of time, intertwining their lives to whatever extent they desire. It's about the death of two people who come together and become reborn as one within two bodies. And they do so within their community, whatever community that might be. It is an utterly profound thing, and so much beyond just "a piece of paper." We don't know how to take marriage seriously anymore. The popular understanding of marriage today seems to be something you do when you love someone. But since we have sch a profound misunderstanding of what love itself is, we don't quite know what we're doing when we get married. People think of it as just another step to take at some point, if the relationship has gone on long enough and you've lived together long enough. (Or, sometimes, people rush into it far too quickly and then are surprised to find they don't actually know their spouse very well.) After all, divorce has become so common, that it's an easy back-up in case the marriage doesn't work. We've lost the understanding of the sacredness involved in marriage. It's not just a statement of love. It's a statement that these two people are ready to die to themselves, to become new people inherently and inextricably tied together, ready to take on all the pain and sacrifices that necessarily come with marriage, ready to put someone else's needs and desires ahead of their own, ready to accept the new life that is a natural outcome of such deep and profound love.
Emotions have become the ruling force of society today. This whole past election was based on emotion - and unfortunately, the other side is good at appealing to the emotions of what many people see as loving, logical choices. The things that I believe in, the things that the Church teaches, aren't as easy to sell based on emotions - at least, not on the surface. It seems hateful to many people to say that two people can't get married just because they're the same gender. It seems illogical to say that maybe free contraception for everyone isn't the best idea; it seems unloving and misogynistic to say that sometimes, women
shouldn't get to chose if their choice includes a death. Romantic comedies are all about the emotions, but rarely do they get to the deeper stuff. And that's where we need to go. Life can't be sustained running on emotions alone. It's like eating ice cream or Twinkies all the time. Sometimes we have to stay and deal with the harder stuff while our emotions are screaming "run away!" Elections can be won on emotion, but then we have to get back to business and realize that some of those emotion-based promises aren't actually feasible. Society tells us that we should get out of relationships when we stop feeling love, regardless of how many years we've been married, how many kids we have, or how we might be harming the community. We are no longer challenged to be the best versions of ourselves, to put the good of another person or of the community ahead of our own desires, to stick it out and make things better instead of leaving when things are hard. And we're all suffering the effects, and probably will for years to come.
But you know what? I still have hope. Our world is a little bit crazy right now, but I think things will get better. One way or another. Somehow. Eventually. Things will swing back the other way (whether that happens because of a cataclysmic collapse, or just the quiet example of people living good lives, only time will tell). Jesus can't be ignored forever, and he's the perfect example of absolute selfless love that we should all aspire to have and to live out, regardless of our vocation, where we are in life, or what we're doing. Everything we do here on earth is all about God in the end, anyway. We'd do well to remember that.